M genitalium was detected in 33 of the individuals in our Add Health subsample, which resulted in a weighted prevalence of 1.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.45, 1.46) (Table 1 ). The prevalence of M genitalium among men (1.1%; 95% CI=0.49, 2.44) and among women (0.8%; 95% CI=0.42, 1.57) was not significantly different (P=.57). Despite some trends, overall there was no significant difference in M genitalium prevalence by age or geographic region, but prevalence varied by race/ethnicity: it was highest among Blacks (4.0%; 95% CI=0.20, 6.63) and was somewhat higher among Latinos (0.8%; 95% CI=0.14, 4.08) compared with Whites (0.4%; 95% CI=0.19, 0.89; P<.001). The organism was not detected in anyone of American Indian or Asian descent.
M genitalium prevalence was significantly higher among Blacks compared with Whites (prevalence ratio [PR] = 8.9; 95% CI = 3.34, ). 4; 95% CI = 3.57, ; Table 1 ). 1% compared with 0.05% among those who did not report vaginal intercourse (PR = 22.5; 95% CI = 4.35, ). Although M genitalium prevalence rose with increased numbers of sexual partners (lifetime and past year), M genitalium–positive respondents reported fewer mean episodes of vaginal intercourse during the past year compared with M genitalium–negative respondents (21.9 vs 69.4; P < .001). M genitalium infection was not significantly associated with age at sexual debut or with correct and consistent condom use (condom use during every episode of vaginal intercourse without any breakage or slippage) within the past 12 months, but it was more often detected among those who had used condoms during their last vaginal intercourse (PR = 4.1; 95% CI = 1.21, ).
One of sexually effective someone (people that reported actually that have engaged in genital gender), M genitalium prevalence try 1
Yards genitalium frequency is actually significantly large among women that made use of depo provera during the past season (PR=4.5; 95% CI=step Bi-Dating-Seiten 1.46, ), however, incidence was not of this usage of most other hormone contraceptives generally speaking. Consistent with highest-risk sexual activity, Yards genitalium incidence is significantly highest certainly one of respondents who felt they you are going to already feel contaminated that have N gonorrhoeae or C trachomatis (PR=step three.4; 95% CI=step one.09, ), certainly one of respondents exactly who examined positive to own C trachomatis (PR=5.4; 95% CI=step one.42, ), and you can certainly one of ladies contaminated with HPV (PR=several.7; 95% CI=step three.29, ). Not one of your own people contaminated with Yards genitalium stated warning signs of urethral otherwise vaginal release sometimes within this in the last 24 hours otherwise inside the past 1 year (including individuals who was indeed coinfected with other STI pathogens), but dos.2% said dysuria before 1 day (data not shown). Also, not one of the M genitalium–positive some one stated diagnoses out-of nongonococcal urethritis, mucopurulent cervicitis, otherwise vaginitis during the past 12 months.
Some of the M genitalium–infected individuals whom didn’t statement vaginal gender had often only same-intercourse people or considering no investigation towards other kinds of intimate passion that possess contributed to experience of Meters genitalium
Of your own 2932 participants having testing weights, 2303 (79.9%) offered research on their current intimate union (Dining table dos ). M genitalium frequency try somewhat large one of people that got a beneficial non-White partner (Publicity = eleven.0–62.4) otherwise a partner whose competition/ethnicity try unlike her (Public relations = 8.4; 95% CI = 2.51, )pared into the incidence off M genitalium among participants exactly who sensed its current spouse had almost every other concurrent people, the newest incidence out of Yards genitalium those types of just who believed the mate are loyal is down (Public relations = 0.1; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.61). Sexual habits instance time between meeting and first genital gender, frequency from vaginal intercourse, and you may dental or receptive rectal intimate relationships just weren’t notably associated which have Yards genitalium disease.